ufo varmıdır sizce?

Benim bu yazımdaki amacım kimseyi ne kötülemek nede tersine gitmektir
sadece 2 kere gorduğum yalnışlığı duzeltmektir.
Şimdi gelelim konumuza bazı arkadaşlarımız NASA'nın linkını vererek
onların ufa olduğunu ıddaa etmişlerdir.Bir kere orayı kaynak gostermek
saçma çünkü dili ingilizce olan bir site.Şimdi kanıtlarım ingilizce
yazının altındadır.



UFOs aren't necessarily alien spacecraft. And some purported UFOs aren't
UFOs at all. Take the example from Apollo 16.

[Resimleri görebilmek için üye olun veya giriş yapın.]
Image above: High-resolution, digital scan of a full frame from the
original Apollo 16 film showing the object in question (top center) and
its position relative to the moon. Reflections in the window are also
visible (left and right). Credit: NASA

Beginning their return from the moon to an April 27, 1972, splashdown,
Astronauts John Young, Thomas Mattingly and Charles Duke captured about
four seconds of video footage of an object that seemed to look a lot
like Hollywood's version of a spacecraft from another world.

[Resimleri görebilmek için üye olun veya giriş yapın.]Image on
right: Image enhancement of the object and linear feature. Credit: NASA

The thing was described as "a saucer-shaped object with a dome on top."
The images were captured with a 16mm motion picture camera shooting at
12 frames per second from a command/service module window. The object
appears momentarily near the moon. As the camera pans, it moves out of
the field of view. It reappears as the camera pans back. It appeared in
about 50 frames.

Some very bright people recently worked hard to analyze that footage.
Their conclusion was that the object wasn't at all what some observers
thought it seemed to be. There is no indication the Apollo 16 crew ever
thought the film showed anything special.

A group headed by Gregory Byrne of Johnson Space Center's Image Science
and Analysis Group completed a report on its investigation earlier this
year. They used a video copy of the film initially, then did a
high-resolution digital scan of the original film for detailed analysis.

[Resimleri görebilmek için üye olun veya giriş yapın.] Image on
left: View of the Apollo Command/Service Module from the Lunar Module
during Apollo 17 showing the location of the EVA floodlight/boom.
Credit: NASA

They stabilized images to correct for camera movement, and then aligned
multiple frames in a sequence. One thing that showed them was that the
object appeared to move slightly with respect to the moon, because of
parallax brought about by slight camera motions and the nearness of the
object to the camera.

The investigators also combined several frames in a sequence, to give
them higher resolution and greater contrast than individual frames. The
combinations showed them more clearly a "linear feature" attached to one
side of the object. They also looked at archived images from other
Apollo missions.

Bottom line: "All of the evidence in this analysis is consistent with
the conclusion that the object in the Apollo 16 film was the EVA
[spacewalk] floodlight/boom. There is no evidence in the photographic
record to suggest otherwise."

kanıt:1.resmin ustundeki yazı:UFOs aren't necessarily alien spacecraft.
And some purported UFOs aren't UFOs at all. Take the example from Apollo
16.Çevirisi için hemecevir.com bakabilirsiniz.

Uçan daireler, muhakkak yabancı uzay aracı değildir. Ve bazı ifade
edilen uçan daireler, herhangi bir şekilde uçan daireler değildir.
Apollo-16'dan örneği al.


Konunun başında belırttığım gıbı kimsenın zıttına gitmek için açmadım
konuyu.